It's truly an interesting question… without other posts it's impossible to be certain. There are many ways to interpret it.
You appear to have a trace of /s4s/ energy, consciously or otherwise. The post comes off as a satirical post-normalfag comment which has the ability to plebfilter newfags/middlefags trying too hard to gatekeep or fit in (see >>1992
). In that case, it's only a 3/10 faget level (slightly below background levels). However be careful, this increases very rapidly if you begin to overuse comments like this.
Or on the other hand, you could be someone who climbed up from /pol/ taking ironic behavior seriously and are simply parroting the aforementioned style without understanding its meaning (8/10 faget level). However, the likelihood of that is lower in a place like this so I'll confidently give you benefit of the doubt.
For future reference, the '88' is redundant; despite the timestamp also containing two sets of dubs, it's obvious what you are highlighting.>>1991
or, you know, this.