Ohai!

Ohai! Pope 22-afm-3185(PP)05:56:52 No.56

It's a raid!

Awesome!

Fuck us up!

Replies: >>76

Dweller 22-afm-3185(PP)06:44:40 No.57

Nvm they got bored :c

Pope 22-afm-3185(PP)09:32:16 No.58

years ago erischan was the biggest polish chan
getting this domain was a mistake idiots xD

Replies: >>59

Zalgo 22-afm-3185(PP)11:08:32 No.59

>>58
this xD naming chan "erischan" was mistake

Dweller 42-afm-3185(PP)12:41:15 No.76

1495642708118.png
(897.2KB, 826x902)

>>56
Now this is quality. I want to do it so fucking bad.

Dweller 52-bcy-3191(SM)07:24:51 No.1577

Was this the only time that soytroons tried to raid us?

https://archive.is/pEb5B

Replies: >>1579

Dweller 52-bcy-3191(SM)13:22:44 No.1579

>>1577
there was the polish invasion which lead to /3/
then soyparty invaded like twice, which lead to like a 2-year rollback due to admindude not being prepared.

Replies: >>1580

Dweller 52-bcy-3191(SM)17:05:25 No.1580

>>1579

>lead to a 2-year rollback

What do you mean?  They wiped out two years of threads?

Replies: >>1581

Pope 52-bcy-3191(SM)21:42:58 No.1581

ClipboardImage.png
(9.6KB, 549x65)

>>1580
not that pope, and wasn't tech syspope at the time, but someone flooded the boards (i dont think it was soykids) and the last backup was made about two years earlier. They're now hourly.

Cabbage 52-bcy-3191(SM)23:11:54 No.1582

17519e51b005278a29c50a4780b3c1b7b20df93376d72e8636fe66e7dd054571.jpg
(112.8KB, 749x782)

Yes. As I vaguely remember it, the raiding party that jak'd the board did not wipe the entire catalog, but only made their presence known. Some post was even left saying something to the effect of "Well, you didn't raid us back, so whatever" and it was that kind of thing and like Pope said when the big flood happened it seemed more like a non-denominational attack.
Also, Polish incident was best incident as it was all so very funny.

/abs/ - Absurdism

You are Sisyphus, this board is your boulder.

Actions: