>>464
4) They do not and I can prove it.
3) That's not necessarily true.
5) My argument is based in reasonable probability, not certainty.
6) The assertion is "You are stupid!" but since only one out of our entire planet of at least twelve people has asserted that, it is technically unlikely to be true. Therefore I may be stupid, but there is insufficient assertions that I was stupid at the time of reading.
7) Since I am irrefutably unlikely to be stupid, and since we are debating, you are therefore stupid!.
Summary: no u version 2